Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40231073›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Phytochemical production and antioxidant activity improvement of

Wipa Yaowachai, Prathan Luecha, Worasitikulya Taratima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wipa YaowachaiDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0004-2122-7236
Prathan LuechaDepartment of Pharmacognosy and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Worasitikulya TaratimaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: Results and conclusion: Results showed that the callus survival rate decreased with increasing colchicine concentration and exposure time. The highest percentage of induced tetraploid (66.67%) and mixoploid (66.67%) calli were obtained at 0.05% and 0.2% colchicine with exposure times of 48 and 24 h, respectively. Tetraploid calli showed the highest TPC (81.28 mg GAE/g extract), TFC (35.33 mg QE/g extract), and antioxidant activity compared to diploid and mixoploid calli. Additionally, tetraploid calli demonstrated an approximately twofold greater increase in TPC and TFC compared to diploid calli. The analysis of polyploid callus samples revealed that tetraploid calli exhibited the highest antioxidant activity, whereas diploid calli demonstrated the lowest antioxidant activity across all applied assays. Therefore, inducing a tetraploid of

Indexed as

AcanthaceaeAntioxidantsPhytochemicalsPolyploidyColchicineFlavonoidsPhenolsPlant ExtractsPlants, MedicinalAntioxidantsColchicineFlavonoidsPhenolsPhytochemicalsPlant ExtractsAntioxidantCallusChemical constituentsColchicineFlow cytometryPolyploidy inductionSnake jasmineTetraploid

Identifiers

PMID40231073
PMCPMC11995891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.