ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025
The Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Use on 1-Year Outcomes After Infrapopliteal Endovascular Intervention.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intravascular Ultrasound and Infrapopliteal Arterial Interventions: Helping the Blind Squirrel Find a Nut?Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Data supporting the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in aortoiliac and femoropopliteal endovascular intervention are becoming increasingly robust, but data in the infrapopliteal circulation remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between IVUS use and 1-year outcomes after infrapopliteal intervention. Methods: All infrapopliteal endovascular interventions that occurred between 2018-2021 at a single academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed. Cases were separated into 2 cohorts based on the use of IVUS. Clinical characteristics, procedural data, and imaging were collected up to 1-year postintervention. The primary outcome of interest was 1-year binary restenosis. Secondary outcomes included rates of 1-year target lesion revascularization, amputation, major adverse limb events, and all-cause mortality. Results: One hundred patients with 142 lesions were included. IVUS was used in 23% of cases. Baseline characteristics, lesion characteristics, and treatment modalities did not differ significantly between cohorts. At 1 year, cases with IVUS utilization had significantly lower rates of binary restenosis (22% vs 57%; Conclusions: Intravascular ultrasound use was associated with lower rates of 1-year restenosis when compared to angiography alone, even after correcting for differences in clinical and procedural characteristics. These findings support the need for a prospective randomized trial evaluating the impact of IVUS use on outcomes after infrapopliteal endovascular intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.