ArticleOxford open digital health2024
The acceptability and feasibility of a mobile phone delivered brief intervention for hazardous drinking in India.
Article in Oxford open digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effectiveness of Brief Interventions (BIs) for hazardous drinking is well established. However, the implementation of BIs at scale in low- and middle-income countries such as India is rare, primarily due to human resource related barriers. This paper describes the testing of acceptability and feasibility, and the preliminary impact, of a mobile phone delivered BI in an uncontrolled treatment cohort and nested qualitative study. Consenting adult (≥18 years) participants with an Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test score between 8 to 15 were recruited from educational institutions, workplaces and primary care settings. The TLFB (Time-Line Follow Back) was administered to participants at baseline and 3 months post recruitment. All participants received the BI through text messages or IVR (Interactive Voice Response) over eight weeks; and in-depth interviews were conducted with some participants. The mean pre and post outcomes were compared using paired t-test. Qualitative data was analysed using thematic analyses. 29 participants received the intervention and 16 (55%) completed the outcome assessments. Some key qualitative findings indicated the desire from participants for fewer messages and messages that did not require interaction; and more messages with motivational content and information on practical skills to reduce drinking. The percentage days abstinent was significantly higher at follow up than baseline in all those who had completed the TLFB at baseline and follow up. Feasibility and acceptability testing is an important component of the intervention development process to ensure that the resulting intervention is suitable for the context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.