ArticleOxford open digital health2024
Mixed-methods, cross-sectional assessment of a client-facing, family planning counseling chatbot in Côte d'Ivoire.
Article in Oxford open digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining Social Media User Types and the Impact on a Reproductive Health Web-Based Intervention for Young People in Francophone West Africa: Randomized Factorial Design Using Latent Class Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2026Trial
- Usability of the "Be Yourself" IA-powered, chatbot-based website for the prevention of adolescent pregnancy.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence is limited about the feasibility, acceptability and effects on family planning (FP) intentions of digital tools, such as chatbots. To help fill this gap, we assessed a chatbot in Côte d'Ivoire with three components: (i) menstrual health information; (ii) FP information and (iii) method recommendations and referrals. We conducted a cross-sectional study to describe user characteristics and perceptions of chatbot usability, content and relevance, and perceived effects on FP-related self-efficacy. We used a mixed-methods approach, including an online survey and in-depth interviews (IDI) with chatbot users, and chatbot back-end data. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively. Between 11 January 2022 and 15 July 2022, we recruited 280 chatbot users for the survey, of whom 28 completed an in-depth interview. Survey participants averaged 22 years old, were majority female (96%), resided in Abidjan (71%) and had some university education (61%). Less than half (48%) were currently using a method to delay/avoid pregnancy. Participants primarily accessed the chatbot to get information for themselves (73%) and felt it was 'easy' (29%) or 'very easy' to use (65%). Most respondents somewhat or strongly agreed that the information provided was accurate/reliable (97%) and was useful to them (96%). Respondents reported feeling more confident in discussing FP topics with their partners and providers after interacting with the chatbot. Our findings suggest that chatbots may be a feasible and acceptable approach to sharing tailored FP information with end-users in a West African context, especially for young women in urban areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.