ArticleBioinformation2024
Effect of amniotic over collagen membrane and buccal fat pad in treating oral sub-mucous fibrosis.
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Amniotic membrane for oral surgical defect coverage: A clinical study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is a chronic condition that involves any portion of the oral cavity and causes restricted mouth opening due to increasing sub mucosal fibrosis. Various surgical treatment approaches have been used to correct the OSMF. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the efficiency of amniotic membrane, collagen membrane and buccal fat pad in OSMF patients. Hence, a total 30 patient's diagnosed with OSMF were alienated equally into 3 groups based on treatment method; Group I: buccal pad of fat (BPF), Group II: mucosal defect with amniotic membrane (AM) and Group III-xenogenous collagen membrane (CM). Results show that AM grafts are advisable alternative for oral tissue restoration than buccal fat pad flaps and collagen membranes in terms of discomfort reduction, mouth opening improvement and epithelisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.