ArticleBioinformation2024
Assessing the efficacy of intraoperative fluorescence imaging for tumor margin identification in breast conserving surgery.
Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy and surgical outcomes of fluorescence-guided surgery in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) aims to remove malignant breast tissue while preserving healthy tissue, with clear margins crucial for reducing recurrence and avoiding additional surgeries. This study evaluated the effectiveness of intraoperative fluorescence imaging (IFI) in achieving negative margins compared to standard intraoperative techniques in 100 retrospectively analyzed patients. IFI-assisted BCS achieved negative margins in 88% of cases versus 65% with standard methods (p < 0.001) and significantly reduced re-excision rates (8% vs. 22%, p = 0.002). Long-term recurrence rates over 12 months were similar between the groups (p = 0.145). These findings suggest that IFI enhances margin visualization, reduces re-excisions and serves as a valuable adjunct to traditional techniques in BCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.