Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230922›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2024

Radiologists' perceptions and readiness for integrating artificial intelligence in diagnostic imaging: A survey-based study.

Prasanna Sakthi Aravazhi, Kumaran Ottilingam Ravindran, Kanika Balasubramani, Mohammed Kamil, Kanishka Gouthaman, Lalit Karki, Sandhiya Thiyagarajan, Akshay Sureshkumar Nair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Prasanna Sakthi AravazhiInstitute of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India.
Kumaran Ottilingam RavindranInstitute of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India.
Kanika BalasubramaniInstitute of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India.
Mohammed KamilInstitute of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India.
Kanishka GouthamanInstitute of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India.
Lalit KarkiDepartment of Radiology, Kathmandu Medical College, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sandhiya ThiyagarajanDepartment of Internal Medicine, MMC, RGGGH, Chennai, India.
Akshay Sureshkumar NairDepartment of General Medicine, Starcare Hospital, Calicut, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing diagnostic imaging, enhancing precision, speed and efficiency. This study explored radiologists' perceptions of AI through a survey of 100 radiologists across various institutions, focusing on awareness, benefits, concerns and preparedness for AI adoption. Most radiologists recognized AI's potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency but expressed concerns about its reliability, job displacement and ethical implications. Readiness to adopt AI varied significantly based on age, experience and familiarity with AI tools. These findings underscore the need for targeted education and training programs to address skepticism and support the effective integration of AI into diagnostic imaging practices.

Indexed as

AI readinessArtificial intelligencediagnostic imagingethics in AIradiologists' perceptionssurvey-based study

Identifiers

PMID40230922
PMCPMC11993419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.