Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230921›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2024

Evaluating pain perception caused by conventional fixed orthodontic treatment and aligners: A comparative study.

Jnananjan Chattopadhyay, Nitya Shrivastava, Anurag Tiwari, Rizwa Syed, Vaishnavi Telang, Amarnath Biradar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jnananjan ChattopadhyayDepartment of Dentistry, Murshidabad Medical College, Berhampore, Murshidabad, West Bengal, India.
Nitya ShrivastavaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bhabha College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Anurag TiwariDepartment of Orthodontics, NIMS Dental College, NIMS University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Rizwa SyedDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bhabha College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Vaishnavi TelangDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SB Patil Institute for Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bidar, Karnataka, India.
Amarnath BiradarDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SB Patil Institute for Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bidar, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthodontic treatments often involve varying degrees of discomfort or pain, which is a primary concern for patients. Traditional fixed orthodontic treatments, like braces, are commonly associated with pain during tooth movement. Clear aligners, an alternative to fixed orthodontics, are perceived to cause less pain. Therefore, it is of interest to compare pain perception in patients undergoing treatment with conventional fixed orthodontics and aligners. Data were collected through patient self-reports and analyzed using statistical tests, with significance set at p<0.05. Patients treated with clear aligners experience significantly less pain compared to those undergoing conventional fixed orthodontic treatment, particularly during the initial stages of treatment. Aligners are a comfortable option for patients concerned about pain during orthodontic care.

Indexed as

clear alignersfixed orthodonticsorthodontic painorthodontic treatmentPain perceptionpatient comfort,visual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID40230921
PMCPMC11993413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.