Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230919›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2024

Study on the MRI features of normal postoperative glenoid labrum compared to recurrent tears.

Saurabh Gangwar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saurabh GangwarDepartment of Radiology, Rajshree Medical Research Institute & Hospital Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study evaluates the effectiveness of MRI and MR arthrograms in detecting recurrent glenoid labral tears, highlighting MRI's ability to visualize soft tissues and assess postoperative repair integrity, crucial for diagnosing labral injuries and ensuring appropriate treatment. The study included 25 patients (72% male, 28% female) with recurrent shoulder repair. Recurrent labral tears were observed in 14 patients on MR arthrogram with 81-91% sensitivity and 76-86% specificity based on age. In 12% of patients, paralabral cysts were observed. Overhead activity was present in 44% of patients and most frequently in males under 30. Recurrent labral tear is seen in most of the patients with MRI imaging. The study found that MRI and MR arthrogram are useful diagnostic instruments with comparatively high sensitivity and specificity for detecting recurrent labral tears in postoperative patients, especially in patients between 35-40 years. This retrospective study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of MR arthrograms in detecting recurrent glenoid labral tears after surgery, analyzing sensitivity, specificity, demographics, recurrence causes and secondary findings.

Indexed as

Glenoid labrummagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)MR arthrogramrecurrent glenoid labral tears

Identifiers

PMID40230919
PMCPMC11993365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.