Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230899›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2024

Postoperative pain control in orthopedic surgery: A randomized trial comparing regional anaesthesia and systemic opioids.

J Naveen Bose, Kaushik Rajavel, Rakshana Munusamy, Priyadarshini Ramesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J Naveen BoseDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Madurai Medical College, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kaushik RajavelDepartment of Orthopaedics, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Rakshana MunusamyDepartment of Surgery, Madurai Medical College, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Priyadarshini RameshDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective pain management is crucial for recovery after orthopedic surgery, influencing outcomes, hospital stay duration and patient satisfaction. This randomized trial compared regional anesthesia (RA) with systemic opioid therapy for postoperative pain control in 100 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. RA resulted in significantly lower pain scores at 12, 24 and 48 hours post-surgery (p < 0.001) and reduced opioid consumption (p < 0.001). Adverse effects like nausea and vomiting were more common in the opioid group (p = 0.002), while functional recovery was superior in the RA group (p = 0.015). The length of hospital stay was similar between groups (p = 0.116). These findings indicate that RA is more effective than systemic opioids for postoperative pain management, with fewer side effects and improved functional recovery, making it a preferred option in orthopedic surgery.

Indexed as

functional recoveryopioid consumptionorthopedic surgerypain controlPostoperative painregional anaesthesiasystemic opioids

Identifiers

PMID40230899
PMCPMC11993417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.