ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2025
Evaluation of EEG pre-processing and source localization in ecological research.
Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Electroencephalography as a Complement to Symptom-Based Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Factors influencing corticomuscular coherence for axial and lower limb musculature in a healthy population: a scoping review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Electroencephalography (EEG) source localization (SL) has shown potential for various applications, from epilepsy and seizure focus localization to psychiatric disorder evaluation. However, questions remain about its neurophysiological plausibility in real-world settings where only EEG signals are available without subject-specific anatomical information. This study investigates whether established pre-processing and source localization methods can produce neurophysiologically plausible activation patterns when applied to naturalistic EEG data without structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or digitized electrode positions. Methods: Proven methods are aggregated into an end-to-end pipeline that includes automatic pre-processing, eLORETA for source estimation, and a shared forward model derived from the ICBM 2009c Nonlinear Symmetric template and its corresponding CerebrA atlas. The pipeline is validated using two distinct datasets: the Healthy Brain Network (HBN) dataset comparing resting and naturalistic video-watching states and the multi-session and multi-task EEG cognitive dataset (COGBCI) comparing different cognitive workload levels. The validation approach focuses on whether the reconstructed source activations exhibit expected neurophysiological patterns via permutation testing. Results: Findings revealed significant differences between resting state and video-watching tasks, with greater activation in posterior regions during video-watching, consistent with known visual processing pathways. The cognitive workload analysis similarly showed progressive activation increases with task difficulty, mapping to regions associated with executive function. Discussion: These results prove that established source localization methods can produce neurophysiologically plausible activation patterns without subject-specific information, highlighting the strengths and limitations of applying these methods to mid-length naturalistic EEG data. This research demonstrates the viability of template-based source analysis for research settings where individual structural imaging is unavailable or impractical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.