ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025
Child abuse prevalence estimates in Canada; comparisons of nationally representative data from 2012 to 2022: a population-based study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The PROTECT databank a population based linked administrative resource on child maltreatment and intellectual disability with early findings.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Self-reported spanking history among adults in Canada: Prevalence, experiences, and attitudinal beliefs.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
- Article
- Trust in radiation treatment for cancer challenged by childhood trauma.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Article
- The relationship between consultation modality and mental health professional type and perceived quality of care and mental health outcomes: A comparison between employed and unemployed individuals.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Up-to-date nationally representative Canadian statistics on child abuse with a focus on sex, sexual identity, and age cohorts are overdue. The objective of the current study was to examine child abuse prevalence estimates (physical abuse, sexual abuse, exposure to intimate partner violence (EIPV), and any child abuse) among adult Canadians, associations with sex (male or female), sexual identity (heterosexual, lesbian or gay, bisexual, or other), and age cohort, and to compare data from 2022 with 2012. Methods: Data were obtained from two Statistics Canada cross-sectional surveys: 1) the 2012 Canadian Community Health Survey-Mental Health (2012 CCHS-MH; n = 23,395; 18+ years) and 2) the 2022 Mental Health and Access to Care (2022 MHACS; n = 9409; 18+ years). Findings: The prevalence of any child abuse in Canada in 2022 was 34.4%, which was significantly higher compared to 2012 (32.1%; p = 0.006). Among the youngest respondents (18-27 years), the prevalence of any child abuse had also increased from 21.7% in 2012 to 26.8% in 2022 (p = 0.002). Sex and age cohort differences were noted. In addition, those identifying as other than heterosexual generally had increased odds of child abuse experiences (Adjusted Odds Ratios ranging from 1.48 to 3.12). Interpretation: The retrospective self-reported prevalence in 2022 was 2.3 percentage points higher compared to 2012. There continues to be a widespread need to develop approaches focusing on child abuse prevention and response, and to ensure that providers receive training in how to recognize and respond safely to family violence, including child abuse. Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Canada Research Chair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.