ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
A weakly supervised deep learning framework for automated PD-L1 expression analysis in lung cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-task masked autoencoder with GAN-based augmentation for PD-L1 prediction from chest CT images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning in Biomarker-Driven Precision Oncology: Automated Immunohistochemistry Scoring and Emerging Directions in Genitourinary Cancers.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Enhanced patient selection with quantitative continuous scoring of PD-L1 expression for IO treatment in metastatic NSCLC.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer immunotherapy has underscored the critical need for reliable methods to identify patient populations likely to respond to ICI treatments, particularly in lung cancer treatment. Currently, the tumor proportion score (TPS), a crucial biomarker for patient selection, relies on manual interpretation by pathologists, which often shows substantial variability and inconsistency. To address these challenges, we innovatively developed multi-instance learning for TPS (MiLT), an innovative artificial intelligence (AI)-powered tool that predicts TPS from whole slide images. Our approach leverages multiple instance learning (MIL), which significantly reduces the need for labor-intensive cell-level annotations while maintaining high accuracy. In comprehensive validation studies, MiLT demonstrated remarkable consistency with pathologist assessments (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.960, 95% confidence interval = 0.950-0.971) and robust performance across both internal and external cohorts. This tool not only standardizes TPS evaluation but also adapts to various clinical standards and provides time-efficient predictions, potentially transforming routine pathological practice. By offering a reliable, AI-assisted solution, MiLT could significantly improve patient selection for immunotherapy and reduce inter-observer variability among pathologists. These promising results warrant further exploration in prospective clinical trials and suggest new possibilities for integrating advanced AI in pathological diagnostics. MiLT represents a significant step toward more precise and efficient cancer immunotherapy decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.