ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
The association between constipation and anxiety: a cross-sectional study and Mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and biopsychosocial associations of functional constipation: a cross-sectional study among adults in Türkiye.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Gut-Brain Axis in Comorbid Constipation and Mood Disorders: Navigating the Efficacy-Tolerability Dilemma Through Emerging Evidence and Future Directions.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- The association between a newly proposed gut microbiota dietary index and obesity among U.S. adults: a cross-sectional analysis based on NHANES 1999-2020.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
- Pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnostic innovations, and multimodal therapeutic strategies for slow transit constipation.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Constipation and Cardiovascular Mortality Risk in Patients With Hypertension: A Long-Term Cohort Study.International journal of hypertension · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The relationship between constipation and anxiety remains underexplored. This study investigates the association between constipation and anxiety in a representative sample of adults in the United States. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2007 to 2010, including 9,126 adults aged ≥20 years. Constipation and anxiety were assessed using standardized survey instruments. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs), and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the findings. Additionally, Mendelian randomization (MR) was employed to assess the potential causal relationship between constipation and anxiety using genetic data from large GWAS datasets. Results: Of the 9,126 participants, 324 reported constipation (prevalence: 3.6%), and 2,424 reported anxiety (prevalence: 26.6%). Anxiety prevalence was significantly higher in individuals with constipation compared to those without (41.4% vs. 26.0%; Conclusion: This study identifies a significant association between constipation and anxiety in a large, nationally representative cohort. While the association remains robust after adjusting for various factors, MR did not provide evidence for a causal relationship. Clinicians should consider evaluating and addressing anxiety symptoms as part of a comprehensive management strategy for patients presenting with constipation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.