Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230793›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Development of a triplex crystal digital PCR for the detection of PRCoV, PRRSV, and SIV.

Yuwen Shi, Kaichuang Shi, Yan Ma, Yanwen Yin, Feng Long, Shuping Feng, Meilan Mo, Jiakang He, Zuzhang Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuwen Shi *Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Kaichuang Shi *Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Yan MaGuangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Yanwen YinGuangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
Feng LongGuangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
Shuping FengGuangxi Center for Animal Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning, China.
Meilan MoGuangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Jiakang HeGuangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.
Zuzhang WeiGuangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Porcine respiratory coronavirus (PRCoV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), and swine influenza virus (SIV) are important pathogens of significant infectious diseases. They cause similar clinical respiratory symptoms, including fever, cough, runny nose, and respiratory distress, which makes these diseases difficult to distinguish from each other. In this study, three pairs of specific primers and TaqMan probes were designed for the conserved regions of the PRCoV S gene, PRRSV N gene, and SIV M gene, respectively. The annealing temperature, primer and probe concentrations, and reaction cycle were optimized, and a triplex crystal digital PCR (cdPCR) assay was established for the detection of PRCoV, PRRSV, and SIV. According to the test results, the assay was capable of specifically detecting PRCoV, PRRSV, and SIV, and there was no cross-reaction with other control swine viruses. Based on the Poisson distribution analysis, the limits of detection (LODs) for PRCoV, PRRSV, and SIV were 6.00, 5.75 and 6.00 copies/reaction, respectively, and the sensitivity was 26 times higher than those of the corresponding multiplex RT-qPCR. The coefficients of variation (CVs) of the intra-assay and inter-assay ranged from 0.19 to 1.84%. The assay was used to test 1,657 clinical samples, and the positivity rates of PRCoV, PRRSV, and SIV were 1.15, 12.79, and 2.05%, respectively. It showed diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 99.82% for PRCoV, 100 and 99.24% for PRRSV, and 100 and 99.69% for SIV, respectively. These results indicated that the triplex cdPCR assay has strong specificity, high sensitivity, and excellent repeatability, which provides a valuable tool for the detection and differentiation of PRCoV, PRRSV, and SIV.

Indexed as

co-infectionporcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virusporcine respiratory coronavirusswine influenza virustriplex crystal digital PCR

Identifiers

PMID40230793
PMCPMC11995635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.