ArticleCureus2025
Emergency Physicians' Perceptions, Knowledge, and Attitudes Toward Family Presence During Resuscitation in the Emergency Department: A Multicenter Survey-Based Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac arrest remains a significant public health issue, with high incidence rates in both in-hospital and out-of-hospital settings. The practice of family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) has gained attention for its potential benefits to patients and their families. This study evaluates the perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes of emergency physicians (EPs) regarding FPDR in the emergency department (ED) and aims to inform policy development at King Abdulaziz University Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
methodsA multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted from January to April 2023, surveying EPs from multiple EDs across the western region of Saudi Arabia. Participants, certified in basic (BLS) or advanced life support (ALS), completed an anonymous online survey adapted from previous studies.
resultsOur study surveyed 122 EPs, with 112 completing the survey. Of the participants, 49.1% were aged 25-29 years, 61.6% were men, and 58.9% had 1-4 years of work experience. Awareness of FPDR was reported by 67.9% (n = 76) of participants. Only 3.6% (n = 4) had a policy allowing FPDR, while 6.3% (n = 7) had a policy prohibiting it. Additionally, 49.1% (n = 55) supported implementing an FPDR policy. Awareness of FPDR was significantly higher among younger, male, and more experienced physicians (p < 0.05). Higher perception and practice scores were observed among those aware of FPDR, those who had participated in CPR with a family member, and those without a prohibiting policy (p < 0.05).
conclusionEPs in the western region of Saudi Arabia generally support FPDR, recognizing its potential benefits. However, concerns about its impact on performance and medicolegal issues warrant further exploration. To implement effective FPDR policies, these concerns must be addressed, along with efforts to promote awareness and training. Future research should expand to include broader healthcare settings and multidisciplinary teams to develop comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.