ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025
Effects of enteral nutrition in stroke: an updated review.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevention and management of enteral nutrition-related diarrhea in stroke patients: barriers and enablers from best evidence to best practice.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Frailty combined with nutritional risk for predicting stroke-associated pneumonia: a cohort study based on a nomogram model.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Comparison of nasogastric tube and intermittent oro-esophageal tube feeding in patients with dysphagia and evaluation of an assessment scale for initial nutritional support selection.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Feeding time index and mortality in intensive care stroke patients: an exploratory cohort study.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2026Observational
- Endometrial carcinoma in a patient with post-stroke sequelae: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Comparison of nutritional outcomes and complication profiles of commercial enteral nutrition and homemade homogenate in patients with dysphagia who are chronically immobilized.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of death and functional decline that places a significant burden on healthcare systems. Malnutrition is a critical clinical concern that complicates the condition of stroke patients and contributes to unfavorable outcomes. Dysphagia is the primary cause of malnutrition in the acute stage after stroke. Enteral nutrition (EN) has been employed to manage the nutritional status of stroke patients to prevent and treat malnutrition. Early EN (EEN) has been shown to reduce mortality and the prevalence of malnutrition while enhancing functional outcomes. In the majority of cases requiring nutritional support, nasogastric tube (NGT) placement is prioritized. However, under specific circumstances, direct enteral tube (DET) feeding that includes percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ), offers distinct advantages, particularly for PEG. Compared to intermittent EN, continuous EN demonstrates better tolerance. An EN protocol providing sufficient nutrient supply and energy support can alleviate neurological deficits and reduce the severity of motor dysfunction in stroke patients, thereby improving their prognosis. Energy-rich formulations of EN and EEN may be associated with a lower incidence of stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP). However, the use of EN may lead to an increased incidence of digestive complications, and hyperglycemia. In this study, we reviewed the indications, opportunities, and management methods for EN application, along with the nutrient composition of nutritional protocols for stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.