Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230702›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

The efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam or polymyxin B based regimens for

Wen-Ming Long, Wei-Xin Xu, Qin Hu, Qiang Qu, Xiao-Li Wu, Ying Chen, Qing Wan, Tian-Tian Xu, Yue Luo, Jian Qu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Global epidemiology of carbapenem-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Evidence-based Recommendations for the Treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-resistantIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wen-Ming Long *Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Wei-Xin Xu *Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qin Hu *Department of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qiang QuDepartment of Pharmacy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiao-Li WuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ying ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Qing WanDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Tian-Tian XuDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yue LuoDepartment of Pharmacy, The People's Hospital of Liuyang, Liuyang, China.
Jian QuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: Results: 170 Conclusion: In conclusion, CAZ/AVI-based regimens demonstrated superior efficacy in clearing

Indexed as

carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosaceftazidime/avibactammicrobiological efficacypolymyxin Bpropensity score-matchedreal-world study

Identifiers

PMID40230702
PMCPMC11994704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.