Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230665›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2025

Generating Risk Reduction Analytics in Complex Cardiac Care Environments (GR

Brian P Quinn, Lauren C Gunnelson, Alex Case, Juan C Ibla, Haoyang H Liu, Elizabeth Lydon, Jessily P Ramirez, Sybil A Russell, Hari Srinivasan, James R Thompson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Brian P QuinnDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lauren C GunnelsonDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alex CaseThe MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia.
Juan C IblaDivision of Cardiac Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Haoyang H LiuThe MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia.
Elizabeth LydonThe MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia.
Jessily P RamirezHealth Affairs Analytics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sybil A RussellThe MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia.
Hari SrinivasanThe MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia.
James R ThompsonThe MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia.
John N KheirDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lisa J BergersenDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
David M SlaterThe MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia.
Kathy J JenkinsDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional statistical methodologies inadequately capture the complexities of real-world practice to assess risk in congenital cardiac catheterization (CCC). Artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) techniques are well-suited to analyze preprocedural patient risk given the complexity and heterogeneity of infrequently performed CCC procedures. We sought to apply supervised ML analytics to an enterprise-level data set to enhance understanding of patient-, procedural-, and system-level risk in patients undergoing CCC. Methods: A comprehensive data set built from electronic health record metadata captured important patient-, procedural-, and system-level characteristics from 2019 through 2020 at Boston Children's Hospital for all patients undergoing diagnostic-only or interventional CCC. Supervised ML was used to develop random forest and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models to predict the outcome of clinically meaningful adverse events. Models were trained on a randomly selected portion of the data set (75%) whereas the remaining data set (25%) was used for testing purposes. Model performance was evaluated using area under receiver operating characteristic curve and a plot showing the calibration between predicted probability deciles and observed probabilities of the model. Feature importance was assessed. Results: Our analysis included 1424 cases. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the random forest and LASSO models were 0.67 and 0.68, respectively. Both algorithms exhibited better than random predictive ability with the LASSO model showing a superior level of calibration. Conclusions: Improving our understanding of risk during preprocedural assessment will inform clinical decision-making and allow for implementation of targeted risk mitigation strategies in high-risk patients to improve CCC patient outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiac catheterizationcongenital heart diseasemachine learningrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID40230665
PMCPMC11993859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.