ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Lingual foramina on cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective radiographic study.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Dental surgeons commonly believed that the mandibular site between the mental foramina is the safest for surgical procedures, but there have been numerous reports of significant bleeding accidents in this area. Adequate knowledge about the presence and variation in the morphology of anterior lingual foramina is necessary before starting surgical procedures such as implant placement and ridge augmentation. Aim: The aim of this study was to analyse the presence, frequency, location and relationship of lingual foramen with the inferior border of mandible on Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans (CBCT). Settings and design: This retrospective radiographic study was designed and conducted at Maharashtra Institute of Dental Sciences & Research, Latur, India in the Department of Periodontology after approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee. Materials and methods: 100 CBCT scans of dentulous and partially edentulous mandible were randomly acquired and assessed in coronal, sagittal, transverse and cross-sectional views. The CBCT scans made for diagnostic purposes under field of view 15 × 5 cm, 200 μm voxel size, of patients >20 and < 70 years of age of both the genders were included. Presence of cysts, tumours, systemic diseases affecting bone, fractures, previous surgery in the inter-foraminal region and poor quality of CBCT scans were excluded. Total number of foramina, their location and vertical distance between them to inferior border of mandible were recorded. Statistical analysis used: Data were entered in data sheets and analysed by using descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were expressed in terms of proportions while quantitative data were expressed in terms of means and standard deviation. Potential significance was evaluated with Chi square tests. Result: 100 CBCT scans (47 male and 53 females) were randomly analysed. All participants had at least 1 lingual foramen (LF). Total 172 LF were detected on 100 CBCT scans, including 154 (89.5 %) medial LF (MLF) and 18 lateral LF (LLF) (10.4 %). Out of 154 MLF, 63.6 % were present superior and 36.4 % inferior to genial tubercles. Out of 100 subjects, single LF in 44, two in 43, three in 11, four in 1 and five in 1 patient were observed. 94.44 % LLF were observed in canine and 1st premolar region. The mean distance from the MLF and inferior border of mandible was 10.87 ± 2.99 mm, while the same for LLF was 7.1 ± 4.76 mm. About one third of the foramina were in between 13.1 and 16 mm distance from inferior border. Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the study, the midline lingual foramen can be considered as normal regular anatomic feature with 99 % prevalence while the lateral lingual foramina occur infrequently with a lot of variability in numbers and present commonly in the canine-first premolar zone. Almost 1/3rd of midline foramina are present superior to the genial tubercles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.