ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Microbiome-based surveillance of zoonotic tick-borne pathogens from urban wild boars in Barcelona, 2022-2023.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoupling Abundance from Centrality: Sexual Dimorphism and Geographical Structuring in thePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Very Low Serological Evidence of Exposure toPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Application of nanopore adaptive sampling for metagenomic detection of tick-borne RNA viruses.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Epidemiology, diagnosis and emerging therapies for Lyme disease of the Northern Hemisphere.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Seasonality, Moisture, and Host Community Structure of Haemaphysalis Ticks in a Subtropical Urban Mosaic in Hong Kong, China.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Predictive multi-omic biomarkers for urban zoonotic spillover detection: an integrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incursions of wild animals into urban areas amplify the potential risks of zoonotic disease transmission by increasing contact between humans and animal reservoirs. Monitoring the presence of pathogens in these animals is crucial for assessing zoonotic risks but remains challenging due to the vast array of known and unknown pathogens harboured by animals. Microbiome-based approaches provide an efficient and comprehensive alternative for monitoring microbial communities and scanning the whole spectrum of bacterial pathogens. In this study, we applied this innovative conceptual framework to implement a sentinel monitoring system for investigating zoonotic tick-borne bacteria in three tick species sampled from wild boars in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona (MAB). Using Nanopore sequencing of the full length 16 s rRNA gene, we demonstrated a fast and cost-effective approach for microbiome analysis. Our findings revealed the presence of two pathogenic genera widely documented in ticks, encompassing five species:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.