Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230570›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapies versus retrograde transvenous obliteration for gastric varices: Multicenter propensity matched analysis.

Suprabhat Giri, Ranjan Kumar Patel, Radhika Chavan, Bhavik Bharat Shah, Jimmy Narayan, Taraprasad Tripathy, Sushant Babbar, Lalit Garg, Rozil Gandhi, Karan Manoj Anandpara and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil-assisted retrograde transgastric occlusion of shunt efferent for gastric variceal bleeding.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Pelvic Space-Occupying Lesions Via Rectal Endoscopic Ultrasound.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Suprabhat GiriDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-5243
Ranjan Kumar PatelDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.
Radhika ChavanGastroenterology, Ansh Clinic, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5363-597X
Bhavik Bharat ShahDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shree Narayana Hospital, Raipur, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4789-1766
Jimmy NarayanDepartment of Gastroenterology, SOA IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
Taraprasad TripathyDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sushant BabbarDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India.
Lalit GargDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Santokba Durlabhji Memorial Hospital, Jaipur, India.
Rozil GandhiDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Sushrut Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Karan Manoj AnandparaDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Heart & Vascular Superspecialty Hospitals, India, India.
Swati DasDepartment of Radiology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Manjit KanungoDepartment of Gastroenterology, SOA IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
Girish Kumar PatiDepartment of Gastroenterology, SOA IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
Hemanta K NayakDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.
Manas Kumar PanigrahiDepartment of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9540-3686
Preetam NathDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Saroj Kanta SahuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Dibya Lochan PraharajDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Bipadabhanjan MallickDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sarat Chandra PanigrahiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sanjay RajputDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ansh Clinic, Ahmedabad, India.
Jimil ShahGastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Anil Chandra AnandDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Manoj Kumar SahuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Retrograde transvenous obliteration (RTO) is an established technique for managing fundal varices. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided glue injection with or without coil is an alternate approach. The present study compared outcomes of EUS-guided therapies with RTO for managing fundal varices. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with fundal varices undergoing EUS-guided intervention or RTO at 10 tertiary centers in India and compared after propensity score matching. The primary outcome was variceal bleeding within 1 year. Secondary outcomes included procedure-related adverse events (AEs), variceal obliteration, reintervention, and mortality. Results: A total of 167 patients (EUS 108, RTO 59) were included, with 59 in each group after propensity score matching. Incidence of variceal bleeding (15.3% vs. 13.6%, Conclusions: EUS-guided therapy offers a safe and effective alternative to RTO for managing fundal varices. Although reintervention rate for GVs were higher than for EUS, incidence of AEs and reintervention for EVs was higher with RTO.

Indexed as

Endoscopic ultrasonographyGI radiologyIntervention EUS

Identifiers

PMID40230570
PMCPMC11996024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.