ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2025
Decision tree-based machine learning algorithm for prediction of acute radiation esophagitis.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Characterization of Acerola-Derived Gold Nanoparticles through Integrated Advanced Distributional Analysis.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Prediction of Excess Relative Risk for Radiation-Induced Solid Thyroid Cancer Among Nuclear Medicine Healthcare Professionals: A Computational Modeling Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiation-induced esophagitis remains a significant challenge in thoracic and neck cancer treatment, impacting patient quality of life and potentially limiting therapeutic efficacy. This study aimed to develop and validate a decision tree-based model for predicting acute esophagitis grades in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Methods: Data from 100 patients receiving thoracic and neck radiotherapy were analyzed. The dataset comprised 33 features, including demographic, clinical, and dosimetric parameters. A decision tree classifier was implemented for both binary (Grade ≥2 vs. <2) and multi-class (Grades 1, 2, and 3) classification. Model performance was evaluated using standard metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Results: The binary classification model achieved 97 % accuracy in distinguishing acute esophagitis. The multi-class model demonstrated 98 % accuracy in predicting specific grades. Key predictive features included V40 (volume receiving 40 Gy), V60, and average esophageal dose. The model generated interpretable decision rules, with V60 ≥ 2.3 strongly indicating Grade 3 esophagitis. Conclusions: The decision tree model demonstrates high accuracy in predicting radiation-induced esophagitis grades while maintaining clinical interpretability. This approach offers potential for treatment optimization and personalized risk assessment in radiotherapy planning. The model's transparency and reliability make it a promising tool for clinical decision support in radiation oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.