Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230490›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

Misdiagnosis-Driven Dental Extractions in Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Study.

Ahmad Fliah Hassan, Ali Al Sheakh, Saif Anmar Badran, Athraa Ali Mahmood, Faaiz Yaqub Alhamdani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmad Fliah HassanOral Medicine Department, College of Dentistry, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-6714-803X
Ali Al SheakhDentistry Department, Al-Yarmouk University College, Baghdad, Diyala, 32001, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-5052-1478
Saif Anmar BadranDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Baghdad, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-2856-5201
Athraa Ali MahmoodDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Surgery, College of Dentistry, Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0003-3095-7092
Faaiz Yaqub AlhamdaniOral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Diagnostics Department, College of Dentistry, Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Baghdad, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0002-4899-824X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dental extraction is an invasive dental procedure. It should not be considered unless indications apply purpose. However, many trigeminal neuralgia (TN) cases have been treated with dental procedures including dental extraction. Objective: To investigate the frequency of dental extractions for trigeminal neuralgia patients. The objectives of the study were to determine the frequency of dental extractions performed due to the misdiagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia and to assess the role of both dentists and patients in the extraction decision-making process. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 104 TN patients treated at a neurosurgical hospital between January 2020 and September 2023. One hundred and eight patients were admitted to the Hospital for the management of TN. Patients' data were collected including biographic data, previous treatments, and the patient's response to dental treatment provided. Results: Out of 104 treated cases with TN, 88 patients were initially misdiagnosed and treated by dentists for dental pain. Among these patients, fifty-five patients were treated with dental extraction. Thirty-two were females, and 23 patients were males. The highest reported cases were found in the single tooth extraction category (27.3%) of the cases. The frequency of cases with multiple extractions decreases with the increase in the number of extracted teeth. The vast majority of the cases (92.7%) showed no response. The vast majority of the cases (92.7%) showed no improvement in pain symptoms following dental extraction. Only 4 cases showed moderate response to dental extraction. Mild response was not reported in this sample. There was no statistically significant relationship between the diagnosis and the number of extractions. Also, no statistically significant relationship between the diagnosis and the patient's role in the extraction decision. Conclusion: There is obvious misdiagnosis leading to a considerable number of unnecessary, and multiple dental extractions for patients with TN. A considerable percentage of which is requested by patients. This reflects poor dental management of oro-facial pain. Dental education programs on both undergraduate and postgraduate levels need to focus on diagnostic defects in facial pain. These findings underscore the need for improved diagnostic training for dental professionals to prevent unnecessary invasive procedures in TN patients.

Indexed as

dental educationdental extractionfacial paintrigeminal neuralgia

Identifiers

PMID40230490
PMCPMC11995997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.