ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025
Maculopathy after long-term use of fondaparinux, a heparin mimetic and heparanase inhibitor.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards standardized skin testing for drug-induced allergic reactions.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report maculopathy associated with the long-term use of fondaparinux, a heparin mimetic and inhibitor of the extracellular matrix enzyme, heparanase. Observations: A 41-year-old woman receiving thrice weekly injections of fondaparinux as prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis for 9 years noticed gray spots in her vision without metamorphopsias. On exam, there was bilateral altered macular pigmentation with speckled hyperpigmentation. Optical coherence tomography revealed irregular thickening of the retinal pigment epithelium. Blue autofluorescence photography demonstrated symmetric well-defined plaques of hyper-and hypoautofluorescence similar to those described in patients chronically treated with pentosan polysulfate (PPS). Review of 13 years of outside medical records confirmed no prior treatment with PPS. Two years before, optical coherence tomography (OCT) done as part of routine eye examination showed early pigmentary changes which were not felt to be clinically significant. Inherited retinal gene panel testing and mitochondrial DNA testing did not reveal pathogenic variants associated with pattern dystrophies. The maculopathy was attributed to fondaparinux due to a pharmacologic effect shared with PPS of heparanase inhibition. Thirteen months after stopping fondaparinux, there was a significant reduction in macular pigmentary changes and improvement in outer retinal abnormalities on OCT. Conclusions and importance: Fondaparinux is structurally and functionally related to PPS, which is also a heparin mimetic and heparanase inhibitor. Both drugs are now associated with phenotypically similar disruptions of the macular retinal pigment epitheliopathy. Although used for different clinical indications, both fondaparinux and PPS are sulfated oligosaccharides related to heparin that bind and inhibit heparanase, a critical enzyme in the extracellular matrix. This case is relevant for research into pharmacologic uses of heparanase inhibitors and monitoring for retinal disease in patients treated with them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.