ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2025
Use of an Electronic Medical Record Alert to Prevent Iatrogenic Interventions in Patients With Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Seizures are a common presentation to the emergency department and the hospital setting. Psychogenic or functional seizures are often misdiagnosed as epileptic seizures or status epilepticus, and patients are subject to aggressive interventions including sedation, intubations, and prolonged hospital admissions. An electronic medical record (EMR) best practice alert (BPA) was implemented in 2016 for all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) at Rush University Medical Center. It informs health care providers of the diagnosis and provides education on interacting with the patient's chart. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an EMR BPA in preventing iatrogenic interventions for patients with a diagnosis of PNES. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who presented to Rush University Medical Center between January 2017 and December 2019 and had a PNES BPA triggered. Data on emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient admissions for these patients from the year before and the year after the first BPA trigger were compared. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar test were used for analysis. Results: A PNES BPA was triggered in 178 patients. One hundred and forty-three (80%) were female. The mean age was 41 (18-81) years. There was a decrease in the number of ED visits; hospital admissions; intensive care unit (ICU) admissions; and interventions such as intubations and rescue benzodiazepine use in the year after the BPA was first triggered compared with the previous year ( Discussion: This study demonstrates that the use of an EMR BPA can be safe and effective in preventing potential iatrogenic interventions and reducing acute health care utilization in patients with PNES. These BPAs can also be used as an educational tool to communicate the presentation, risks, and needs of these patients within the hospital setting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.