ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Naples Prognostic Score as a Novel Prognostic Prediction Tool for Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Therapy.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A composite immune-nutritional and tumor marker score predicts outcomes in LA-ESCC treated with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and surgery.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic Associations of the Naples Score for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and a Prognostic Meta-Analysis.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Development of a Prognostic Nomogram Model and Establishment of a Risk Stratification System Based on the Naples Prognostic Score for Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Who Have Undergone Radical Surgery.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Prognostic Role of the Naples Score in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Missed Opportunity in Inflammation-Based Stratification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Association Between the Naples Score and Recurrence in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation.Cardiovascular therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a highly invasive malignancy with poor prognosis, especially in its locally advanced stages. Recent studies have highlighted the role of inflammation and nutrition in cancer prognosis. The Naples prognostic score (NPS), which integrates inflammatory and nutritional markers, has demonstrated prognostic value in various cancers. However, its applicability in patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC after neoadjuvant therapy remains unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the NPS in predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in these patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 175 patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between 2016-2020. Patients were grouped by NPS scores (0,1-2,3-4). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the predictive accuracy of NPS was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS. Results: Significant differences in OS (p=0.0025) and PFS (p=0.0018) were observed across the three NPS groups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed that patients with higher NPS scores (NPS group 2) had significantly worse OS (HR = 2.768, 95% CI: 1.239-6.183, p = 0.013) and PFS (HR = 3.345, 95% CI: 1.574-7.109, p = 0.002). The area under the curve (AUC) for NPS was 0.63 for OS and 0.67 for PFS, indicating moderate predictive value. Conclusion: The NPS is a simple and effective prognostic tool for assessing survival outcomes in patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC following neoadjuvant therapy. Its integration into clinical practice may aid in better stratification and treatment decision-making for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.