Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230436›Full record

ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025

Naples Prognostic Score as a Novel Prognostic Prediction Tool for Resectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Weiming Chen, Guobing Xu, Xin Yan, Shuo Wang, Qichang Xie, Qing Liu, Bin Zheng, Chun Chen, Yong Zhu, Zhang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Weiming Chen *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Guobing Xu *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Xin Yan *Department of Cardiac Medical Center Nursing, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Shuo WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Qichang XieDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Qing LiuOncology Department of Fujian Medical university Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Bin ZhengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Chun ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Yong ZhuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Zhang YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a highly invasive malignancy with poor prognosis, especially in its locally advanced stages. Recent studies have highlighted the role of inflammation and nutrition in cancer prognosis. The Naples prognostic score (NPS), which integrates inflammatory and nutritional markers, has demonstrated prognostic value in various cancers. However, its applicability in patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC after neoadjuvant therapy remains unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the NPS in predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in these patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 175 patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital between 2016-2020. Patients were grouped by NPS scores (0,1-2,3-4). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the predictive accuracy of NPS was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify independent prognostic factors for OS and PFS. Results: Significant differences in OS (p=0.0025) and PFS (p=0.0018) were observed across the three NPS groups. Multivariable Cox regression analysis confirmed that patients with higher NPS scores (NPS group 2) had significantly worse OS (HR = 2.768, 95% CI: 1.239-6.183, p = 0.013) and PFS (HR = 3.345, 95% CI: 1.574-7.109, p = 0.002). The area under the curve (AUC) for NPS was 0.63 for OS and 0.67 for PFS, indicating moderate predictive value. Conclusion: The NPS is a simple and effective prognostic tool for assessing survival outcomes in patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC following neoadjuvant therapy. Its integration into clinical practice may aid in better stratification and treatment decision-making for these patients.

Indexed as

esophageal squamous cell carcinomaneoadjuvant therapyNPS scoreoverall survivalprognostic assessmentprogression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID40230436
PMCPMC11994464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.