Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230432›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2025

Protocol for a double-blind crossover randomised controlled trial to investigate inhalation challenge to assess inducible laryngeal obstruction: CH-ILO.

Jemma Haines, Maria G Belvisi, Eric C Dubuis, Rachel J Dockry, Kimberley J Holt, James H Hull, Janelle Yorke, Stephen J Fowler, Jaclyn Ann Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jemma HainesFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3813-041X
Maria G BelvisiRespiratory Pharmacology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1652-4370
Eric C DubuisRespiratory Pharmacology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rachel J DockryFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0908-3362
Kimberley J HoltFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0413-8085
James H HullRoyal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4697-1526
Janelle YorkeFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Stephen J FowlerFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-1663
Jaclyn Ann SmithFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8837-4928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) remains a poorly understood condition in part due to lack of understanding about the underlying neuronal mechanisms. Many suffer delayed confirmed diagnosis as no standardised assessment exists. Based on previous work, we propose citric acid (CA) is the most appropriate inhalation agent for inducing upper airway reflex responses, with a view to developing an inhalation challenge test for ILO. Methods and analysis: This is a single-centre, double-blind crossover study. The primary objective is to identify if CA inhalation challenge provokes laryngeal obstruction in patients with confirmed ILO. We will recruit 10 participants with ILO, 10 with refractory chronic cough (RCC) and 10 healthy controls. Each participant will undergo two inhalation challenges during laryngoscopy, with ascending concentrations of CA or saline control; they will be randomised sequentially by a computer-generated schedule to determine order of delivery. Follow-up is a telephone consultation. Randomisation and preparation of challenge agents will be by an unblinded study team member not involved in data analysis. Challenge agents will only be unblinded on study completion. Log Conclusion: This will be the first randomised controlled trial to investigate the role of inhalation challenge as an assessment tool to evoke laryngeal obstruction in patients with confirmed ILO. If results prove CA inhalation challenge agent provokes ILO, it will provide new insights into neuronal mechanisms and support development of a standardised diagnostic test.

Identifiers

PMID40230432
PMCPMC11995274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.