Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230408›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Leveraging large language models to predict antibody biological activity against influenza A hemagglutinin.

Ella Barkan, Ibrahim Siddiqui, Kevin J Cheng, Alex Golts, Yoel Shoshan, Jeffrey K Weber, Yailin Campos Mota, Michal Ozery-Flato, Giuseppe A Sautto

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ella BarkanIBM Research-Israel, Haifa, Israel.
Ibrahim SiddiquiCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kevin J ChengIBM TJ Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.
Alex GoltsIBM Research-Israel, Haifa, Israel.
Yoel ShoshanIBM Research-Israel, Haifa, Israel.
Jeffrey K WeberIBM TJ Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.
Yailin Campos MotaFlorida Research and Innovation Center, Cleveland Clinic, Port St. Lucie, FL, USA.
Michal Ozery-FlatoIBM Research-Israel, Haifa, Israel.
Giuseppe A SauttoFlorida Research and Innovation Center, Cleveland Clinic, Port St. Lucie, FL, USA.

Funding

COVID Supplement - COMPONENT A OF THE COLLABORATIVE INFLUENZA VACCINE INNOVATION CENTERS (CIVICS) PROGRAM TO DESIGN AND EVALUATE INNOVATIVE INFLUENZA VACCINE APPROACHES,75N93019C00052 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI ROSS, TED · 2019 to 2025
$74.6M
NIAID NIH HHS 75N93019C00052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent one of the most prevalent FDA-approved treatments for autoimmune, infectious, and cancer diseases. However, their discovery and development remains a time-consuming and costly process. Recent advancements in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have shown significant promise in revolutionizing antibody discovery field. Models that predict antibody biological activity enable in silico evaluation of binding and functional properties; such models can prioritize antibodies with the highest likelihood of success in laboratory testing procedures. We explore an AI model for predicting the binding and receptor blocking activity of antibodies against influenza A hemagglutinin (HA) antigens. Our model is developed with the Molecular Aligned Multi-Modal Architecture and Language (MAMMAL) framework for biologics discovery to predict antibody-antigen interactions using only sequence information. To evaluate the model's performance, we tested it under various data split conditions to mimic real-world scenarios. Our model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) score of ≥ 0.91 for predicting the activity of existing antibodies against seen HAs and an AUROC score of 0.9 for unseen HAs. For novel antibody activity prediction, the AUROC was 0.73, which further declined to 0.63-0.66 under stringent constraints on similarity to existing antibodies. These results demonstrate the potential of AI foundation models to transform antibody design by reducing dependence on extensive laboratory testing and enabling more efficient prioritization of antibody candidates. Moreover, our findings emphasize the critical importance of diverse and comprehensive antibody datasets to improve the generalization of prediction models, particularly for novel antibody development.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligence (AI)Binding assayHemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assayHemagglutinin (HA)Influenza virusLarge language models (LLM)Machine learning (ML)Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)

Identifiers

PMID40230408
PMCPMC11995015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.