ArticleASIDE gastroenterology2025
Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunctive Sedative in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in ASIDE gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ED95 of Ciprofol Combined with Esketamine or Sufentanil in Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Dose-Finding and Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Effects of Esketamine-Dexmedetomidine Combination on Immediate Postprocedural Oxygenation Index in Severe Pneumonia Patients Undergoing Bedside Fiberoptic Bronchoscopic Sputum Aspiration: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique for removing dysplastic lesions in the gastrointestinal tract but carries risks like pain and perforation. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-receptor agonist, offers potential benefits as an adjunct sedative during ESD by providing anxiolysis and analgesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses its efficacy and safety. Methodology: We searched databases including Embase, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to April 21, 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies used dexmedetomidine with other sedatives for ESD. We analyzed outcomes such as en-bloc and complete resection rates, sedation duration, and adverse events, using RevMan for meta-analysis with a random-effects model. Results: The initial search retrieved 216 studies and after screening, eight studies were included in the final analysis. Dexmedetomidine showed no significant difference in en-bloc or complete resection rates compared to controls. Sedation and procedure times were similar between the two groups as well. Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced restlessness (OR 0.15, 95% CI:0.07 to 0.29) and increased bradycardia (OR 7.15, 95% CI 3.17 to 16.11) compared to controls. Upon subgroup analysis, Dexmedetomidine plus Propofol, and Dexmedetomidine plus Midazolam, revealed the same findings regarding restlessness and bradycardia compared to controls which confirmed the adjunctive effects of Dexmedetomidine. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as an adjunctive sedative appears safe and effective in ESD, reducing restlessness without significant adverse events. The risk of bradycardia is increased, which may be reflective of reduced physiological stress. Future studies should explore optimal dosing and compare Dexmedetomidine with other sedatives in diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.