Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230368›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2025

Evaluation of coronary perfusion pressure and diastolic blood pressure calculation methods in a swine model of pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Jeremy C Zuckerberg, Tiffany Ko, M Katie Weeks, Nicholas J Widmann, Martha F Kienzle, Hunter A Gaudio, Luiz Eduardo V Silva, Ron W Reeder, Robert M Sutton, Robert A Berg and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jeremy C ZuckerbergDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tiffany KoResuscitation Science Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
M Katie WeeksResuscitation Science Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nicholas J WidmannResuscitation Science Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Martha F KienzleDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hunter A GaudioResuscitation Science Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Luiz Eduardo V SilvaDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ron W ReederDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Robert M SuttonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert A BergDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Todd J KilbaughDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ryan W MorganDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Improving Pediatric Cardiac Arrest Survival and Neurologic OutcomeR01HL141386 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI KILBAUGH, TODD JUSTEN · 2019 to 2023
$4.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Measurement of coronary perfusion pressure (CoPP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is important for titration of physiologic-directed CPR. However, agreement between different calculation methods and their relative performance as outcome discriminators are not well established. Methods: Four calculation methods, differentiated by sampling technique, were retrospectively applied to pressure waveforms from piglet CPR: late diastole (CoPP Results: Relative to CoPP Conclusions: During piglet CPR, measurements by late diastole, mid-diastole, and diastolic mean strongly agreed, whereas those at diastolic minimum were more discrepant. All methods performed similarly in discrimination of ROSC.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationCoronary perfusion pressureDiastolic blood pressurePediatrics

Identifiers

PMID40230368
PMCPMC11995776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.