Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230362›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

What Sets Indexed Orthopaedic Journals Apart? A Comparative Analysis of Quality Metrics Between Indexed Orthopaedic Journals and Nonindexed Orthopaedic Journals.

Alex P Percle, Austin Hansen, Aaron Sheppard, Landon Tujague, Robert W Rutz, Patrick A Massey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex P PercleLouisiana State University Health Shreveport, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shreveport, Louisiana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6702-5283
Austin HansenLouisiana State University Health Shreveport, School of Medicine, Shreveport, Louisiana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8435-3389
Aaron SheppardLouisiana State University Health Shreveport, School of Medicine, Shreveport, Louisiana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6958-7834
Landon TujagueLouisiana State University Health Shreveport, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shreveport, Louisiana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3092-5729
Robert W RutzLouisiana State University Health Shreveport, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shreveport, Louisiana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4706-5231
Patrick A MasseyLouisiana State University Health Shreveport, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shreveport, Louisiana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8637-0122

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The PubMed database is used by many organizations as the benchmark for quality publications. This study aimed to identify quality metrics distinguishing orthopaedic journals indexed in PubMed from nonindexed journals. A second aim was to compare metrics of orthopaedic journals indexed in other major databases vs. nonindexed journals. We hypothesized that indexed orthopaedic journals would have several measurable attributes differentiating them from nonindexed journals. Methods: A list of all current orthopaedic journals in publication in 2021 was compiled. The journals were characterized based on their index status in PubMed, Master Journal List, Journal Citation Reports (JCR), MEDLINE, or Directory of Open Access Journals. Various journal attributes were collected and compared by indexed status. Each variable's association with indexed journals was determined through statistical analysis. Results: Of 478 evaluated journals, 271 were indexed by PubMed. Univariate analysis demonstrated significant associations between PubMed indexing and society affiliation, physician editorial leadership, print version availability, subscription availability, impact factor (IF) listed in JCR, use of Creative Commons licenses, Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) membership, journals that require an article processing charge (APC), and earlier year of first issue (all with p < 0.001). Logistic regression of journals listed in any index demonstrates that COPE membership had the highest impact on indexed status (odds ratio = 34.19; 95% confidence interval 5.69-105.59; p < 0.001). The regression model also demonstrated that society affiliation, subscription availability, MD designation on website for editors, year of first issue, and number of physician editors have significant associations with indexed journals. Conclusion: COPE membership was the most distinguishing characteristic of indexed orthopaedic journals. Physician editorial leadership and society affiliation were also strong predictors of a journal having an indexed status. In addition, having a print version and/or subscription available, use of Creative Commons licenses, higher IF, longer publication history, and higher APC charge were associated more frequently with indexed journals. Authors should consider these factors when submitting articles to a journal and use caution submitting to journals which do not meet these quality metrics.

Identifiers

PMID40230362
PMCPMC11981467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.