ReviewJB & JS open access
Inclusion of Medical Students in the Operating Room, Are Patients at Risk? A Retrospective Comparison of Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the advent of virtual clerkships, the ability of medical students to be involved in direct patient care continues to be scrutinized. One such area that has come under scrutiny is the role medical students should play in the operating room. The major critiques brought up by OR staff and surgeons are potential increases in contamination rates and operative times. In this study, we hope to reveal that medical students do not significantly increase postoperative infections or operative times for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: TKA cases were collected from 3 separate surgeons between 2021 and 2022. Operative times for TKA were compared when medical students were present and when students were not. The same was then done to compare the 2 groups for 30-day and 90-day emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions as well as 1-year deep/superficial infection rates. Results: Five hundred eighty-five cases met inclusion criteria. When averaging the operative times of the 3 surgeons with and without medical students, we found that medical student-assisted cases took 84.6 minutes and without students took 80.1 minutes (p value = 0.0056). Complication rates were higher in the student group (3.73% vs 11.67%, p-value = 0.004). When comparing infection rates, we found that there was a slight reduction in infection rate, 0.37% vs 0.63% with students present (student vs no student; p-value = 1.00). Discussion: This study appears to reassure hospital systems and operating room staff that medical students do not significantly alter infection rates in TKA. In addition, while they do extend operative times, on average, it was less than 5 minutes per case, which seems to be a reasonable amount of time to sacrifice in light of no increase to aggregate complications within 1 year.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.