Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40230270›Full record

Observational studyKorean journal of anesthesiology2025

Evaluation of the efficacy of M-TAPA and EXORA block application for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, single-blind, observational study.

Korgün Ökmen, Durdu Kahraman Yıldız, Gökberk Kürşat Ülker

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07187310 narecruitingnot on this map

The Analgesic Efficacy of EXORA Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorFayoum University HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled114ConditionsPostoperative PainArmsEXORA block, Erector Spinae Plane block
NCT07507799 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Analgesic Efficacy of Low-Volume Versus Standard-Volume 0.25% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique and Rectus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFayoum University HospitalRan2026 to 2026Enrolled96ConditionsPain, Postoperative, Post Operative AnalgesiaArmsEXORA block 15, EXORA block 25
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. External Oblique-Rectus Abdominis block for robotic adrenalectomy.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Korgün ÖkmenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Bursa, Turkey.
Durdu Kahraman YıldızDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Bursa, Turkey.
Gökberk Kürşat ÜlkerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Bursa, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent field block methods are used for analgesia following abdominal surgery. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of a modified thoracoabdominal nerve block via the perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) and that of an external oblique and rectus abdominis plane (EXORA) block for anterolateral upper abdominal analgesia.

methodsThis study included 90 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into three groups (n = 30 per group): a control group, which received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA); an EXORA block group, which received an EXORA block with 0.25% bupivacaine + IV-PCA; and an M-TAPA block group, which received an M-TAPA with 0.25% bupivacaine + IV-PCA. The primary outcome was postoperative pain (at rest and on movement), evaluated using numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included tramadol use, the side effect profile, dermatomal spread, and additional analgesic use at 12 h and 24 h postoperatively.

resultsNRS scores as well as the mean tramadol consumption at 12 h and 24 h postoperatively were significantly lower in the EXORA and M-TAPA groups than in the control group (all P < 0.001). Sensory block was recorded in the lateral and anterior abdomen from T7 to T11 after both EXORA block and M-TAPA application.

conclusionsEXORA block and M-TAPA application provided similar levels of analgesia to the upper abdominal wall after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Further data should be obtained from cadaveric and other types of studies.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicNerve BlockPostoperative PainAdultAgedAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementProspective StudiesRectus AbdominisSingle-Blind MethodAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineAbdominal wallAnalgesiaCholecystectomy, laparoscopicNerve blockPain, postoperativeUltrasonography.

Identifiers

PMID40230270
PMCPMC12326565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.