Observational studyKorean journal of anesthesiology2025
Evaluation of the efficacy of M-TAPA and EXORA block application for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, single-blind, observational study.
Observational study in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Analgesic Efficacy of EXORA Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia
Analgesic Efficacy of Low-Volume Versus Standard-Volume 0.25% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided External Oblique and Rectus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thoracoabdominal nerves block through the perichondrial approach: a narrative review.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2026Review
- Recto-intercostal fascial plane block for upper abdominal analgesia: the ultimate solution?Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Comment on "Evaluation of the efficacy of M-TAPA and EXORA block application for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, single-blind, observational study".Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2025Article
- External Oblique-Rectus Abdominis block for robotic adrenalectomy.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferent field block methods are used for analgesia following abdominal surgery. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of a modified thoracoabdominal nerve block via the perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) and that of an external oblique and rectus abdominis plane (EXORA) block for anterolateral upper abdominal analgesia.
methodsThis study included 90 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were divided into three groups (n = 30 per group): a control group, which received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA); an EXORA block group, which received an EXORA block with 0.25% bupivacaine + IV-PCA; and an M-TAPA block group, which received an M-TAPA with 0.25% bupivacaine + IV-PCA. The primary outcome was postoperative pain (at rest and on movement), evaluated using numerical rating scale (NRS) scores at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included tramadol use, the side effect profile, dermatomal spread, and additional analgesic use at 12 h and 24 h postoperatively.
resultsNRS scores as well as the mean tramadol consumption at 12 h and 24 h postoperatively were significantly lower in the EXORA and M-TAPA groups than in the control group (all P < 0.001). Sensory block was recorded in the lateral and anterior abdomen from T7 to T11 after both EXORA block and M-TAPA application.
conclusionsEXORA block and M-TAPA application provided similar levels of analgesia to the upper abdominal wall after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Further data should be obtained from cadaveric and other types of studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.