ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Assessing the impact of batch effect associated missing values on downstream analysis in high-throughput biomedical data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-intensive immune network modelling for One Health.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Clarifying the scope and capabilities of ROTS in differential expression analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Practical Impact of Imputation and Batch-Effect Correction for Proteomics/Peptidomics Differential-Abundance Analysis.Proteomics · 2026Article
- Spectronaut and DIA-NN: A Comparison of their Performance in the Analysis of Lung Adenocarcinoma Biopsies.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Protein-level batch-effect correction enhances robustness in MS-based proteomics.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Batch effect associated missing values (BEAMs) are batch-wide missingness induced from the integration of data with different coverage of biomedical features. BEAMs can present substantial challenges in data analysis. This study investigates how BEAMs impact missing value imputation (MVI) and batch effect (BE) correction algorithms (BECAs). Through simulations and analyses of real-world datasets including the Clinical Proteomic Tumour Analysis Consortium (CPTAC), we evaluated six MVI methods: K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Mean, MinProb, Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations (MICE), and Random Forest (RF), with ComBat and limma as the BECAs. We demonstrated that BEAMs strongly affect MVI performance, resulting in inaccurate imputed values, inflated significant P-values, and compromised BE correction. KNN, SVD, and RF were particularly prone to propagating random signals, resulting in false statistical confidence. While imputation with Mean and MinProb were less detrimental, artifacts were nonetheless introduced. Furthermore, the detrimental effect of BEAMs increased in parallel with its severity in the data. Our findings highlight the necessity of comprehensive assessments and tailored strategies to handle BEAMs in multi-batch datasets to ensure reliable data analysis and interpretation. Future work should investigate more advanced simulations and a variety of dedicated MVI methods to robustly address BEAMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.