ArticleACS sensors2025
Wearable 3D-Printed Microneedle Sensor for Intradermal Temperature Monitoring.
Article in ACS sensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physics-Informed Optimization for the Sub-Feature-Scale Fabrication of Hollow Microneedles via Digital Light Processing.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Evolution of 3D-Printed Microneedles toward Closed-Loop Theranostic Platforms.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Integrating Polymeric 3D-Printed Microneedles with Wearable Devices: Toward Smart and Personalized Healthcare Solutions.Polymers · 2025Review
- Progress and Strategies of Wearable Sensors in Human Health Monitoring Based on Physiological, Biochemical, and Environmental Signals.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Skin in the game: a review of computational models of the skin.BioData mining · 2025Review
- Recent Developments in Microneedle Biosensors for Biomedical and Agricultural Applications.Micromachines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate temperature monitoring plays a crucial role in understanding the physiological status of patients and the early diagnosis of diseases commonly associated with local and global infections. Intradermal temperature measurement is, in principle, more precise than skin surface detection, as it prevents interference from environmental temperature changes and skin secretions. However, to date, precise and reliable intradermal temperature monitoring in a real-time and continuous manner remains a challenge. We propose herein high-resolution 3D printing to fabricate a mechanically robust and biocompatible hollow microneedle, filled with a temperature-responsive conducting polymer (poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): polystyrenesulfonate, PEDOT:PSS) to develop a microneedle temperature sensor (T-MN). The significance is 2-fold: rational design of robust MNs with high resolution in the micrometer domain and the implementation of a conducting polymer in a MN format for temperature sensing. The analytical performance of the developed T-MN is in vitro evaluated under mimicked intradermal conditions, demonstrating good sensitivity (-0.74%° C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.