Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40229957›Full record

ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2025

Students Perceive Similar Gains in Collaboration, Communication and Professional Skills in Two Distinct Experiential Learning Courses.

Michelle Arnot, Jinhee Kim, Michelle French, Sonia Y Lin, Charlotte Pashley, Rebecca R Laposa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michelle ArnotDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6933-4533
Jinhee KimDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Michelle FrenchDepartment of Physiology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4157-0371
Sonia Y LinDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Charlotte PashleyDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-9168-3803
Rebecca R LaposaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5608-7884

Funding

Co-operative Education and Work-Integrated Learning Canada 2021-R3-C340Co-operative Education and Work-Integrated Learning Canada 2021-R3-C406Co-operative Education and Work-Integrated Learning Canada 2022-R3-C733Co-operative Education and Work-Integrated Learning Canada 2022-R3-C772Co-operative Education and Work-Integrated Learning Canada 2023-R3-C1221Co-operative Education and Work-Integrated Learning Canada 2023-R3-C998University of Toronto
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experiential learning (EL) is a high-impact teaching practice. Despite this, it can be challenging to embed EL into educational curricula at scale due to resource constraints, such as the number of faculty members available to supervise research projects. Here we report on two distinct elective courses in a Pharmacology curriculum, both of which incorporate EL in different ways. The first course, Pharmacology and Toxicology in Society, involves community partnerships and a focus on harm reduction and drug misuse. The second course, Biomedical Incubator Capstone Project, includes student teams working as a simulated biotechnology startup. Our research questions were: (1) To what extent did students perceive gains in their skills in four domains: teamwork, career preparedness, critical thinking and problem solving, and application of theory to practice ? (2) Did student responses differ between the two EL courses? We surveyed students in both courses over three iterations to assess their perceived gains in skills across these four domains. Surveys contained both quantitative (Likert) elements and qualitative open-ended questions. We conducted mixed methods analyses of student responses. Overall student responses were positive to Likert prompts (87%-96% either agreed or strongly agreed) exploring these domains. Thematic analysis of responses to open-ended questions highlighted the transformative nature of EL experiences in both courses. Our work highlights the finding that strikingly different EL experiences can result in similar student perceptions of gains in teamwork, career preparedness, critical thinking and problem solving, and application of theory to practice. The work demonstrates the effectiveness of expanded opportunities for quality EL in Pharmacology programs and beyond.

Indexed as

PharmacologyProblem-Based LearningProfessional CompetenceStudentsCommunicationCooperative BehaviorCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairesapplication of knowledgeexperiential learninghigher‐order thinkingprofessional skillsreflectionteamwork

Identifiers

PMID40229957
PMCPMC11996701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.