Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40229928›Full record

ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2025

Impact of insurance coverage on access to assisted reproductive technology: A nationwide survey in Japan (the IZANAMI project).

Aika Wada, Mitsutoshi Yamada, Hiromitsu Shirasawa, Seung Chik Jwa, Keiji Kuroda, Miyuki Harada, Yutaka Osuga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aika WadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsutoshi YamadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7560-316X
Hiromitsu ShirasawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5300-0037
Seung Chik JwaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8815-5714
Keiji KurodaCenter for Reproductive Medicine and Endoscopy, Sugiyama Clinic Marunouchi, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2759-9159
Miyuki HaradaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yutaka OsugaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Children and Families Agency Program JPMH23DB0101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAssisted reproductive technology (ART) is a well-established infertility treatment. However, financial and geographical barriers can hinder patient access. The Japanese government implemented insurance coverage in April 2022 for specific ART treatments. This study assessed the effects of insurance coverage on ART utilization and accessibility.

methodsAn online survey was administered to 427 ART facilities that participated in a pre-policy assessment from December 1, 2023, to January 30, 2024.

resultsA total of 283 facilities responded (response rate: 66.3%). The number of ART patients increased by 4.0% (217 699-226 401) following the implementation of insurance coverage. The number of insured patients aged 25-43 years increased by 6.6%, with a notable increase of 22.9% (range: 44 144-54 253) in the 25- to 34-year age group. However, the number of uninsured patients aged ≥44 decreased by 16.3%; 172 facilities experienced an increased number of patients, whereas 111 facilities experienced no increase or decline. Patient growth rates were significantly higher in rural areas than in metropolitan regions (mean difference: 0.07; 95% confidence interval: 0.0-0.1; p = 0.03). Although there was a significant negative association between the proportion of out-of-pocket treatment and the rate of patient increase (p = 0.02), no such association was observed in rural areas (p = 0.68).

conclusionsInsurance coverage improved patient access to ART services, especially for those in their 20s and early 30s. However, the number of patients in the uninsured group decreased significantly. Accessibility in rural areas also notably improved. These findings highlight the importance of economic support for enhancing ART accessibility.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdultFemaleHumansJapanMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesaccess to careassisted reproductive technologyeconomic factorsinfertilityinsurance

Identifiers

PMID40229928
PMCPMC11997234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.