ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Interpretable prognostic modeling for long-term survival of Type A aortic dissection patients using support vector machine algorithm.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioinformatics Analysis of Ferroptosis-Related Driver Genes in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Integrating Blood-Based Immune-Inflammation Biomarkers into Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prognostic Models in Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Reducing Educational Bias in Cognitive Assessment via Dynamic Support Vector Machine Weighting: Validation Study on an Education-Stratified Dataset.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- Machine learning approaches for risk prediction in aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence as a Prognostic Tool in the Management of Acute Aortic Syndrome and Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to develop a reliable and interpretable predictive model for long-term survival in Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) patients, utilizing machine learning (ML) algorithms.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients diagnosed with TAAD who underwent open surgical repair at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, from September 2017 to December 2020, and at the Chongqing University Central Hospital between October 2019 and April 2020. Cases with less than 20% missing data were imputed using random forest algorithms. To identify significant prognostic factors, we performed LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) Cox regression analysis, including preoperative blood markers, previous medical history and intraoperative condition. Based on the advantages of the model and the characteristics of the data set, we subsequently developed a machine learning-based prognostic model using Support Vector Machine (SVM) and evaluated its performance across key metrics. To further explain the decision-making process of the SVM model, we employed SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values for model interpretation.
resultsA total of 171 patients with TAAD were included in model training and internal test groups; 73 patients with TAAD were included in external test group. Through LASSO Cox regression, univariate analysis, and clinical relevance assessment, seven feature variables were selected for modeling. Performance evaluation revealed that the SVM model showed excellent performance in both the training and test sets, with no significant overfitting, indicating strong clinical applicability. In the training set, the model achieved an AUC of 0.9137 (95% CI 0.9081-0.9203) and in the internal and external testing set, 0.8533 (95% CI 0.8503-0.8624) and 0.8770 (95% CI 0.8698-0.8982), respectively. The accuracy values were 0.8366, 0.8481 and 0.8030; precision values were 0.8696, 0.8374 and 0.8235; recall values were 0.8421, 0.7933 and 0.7651; F1 scores were 0.8290, 0.8148 and 0.7928; Brier scores were 0.1213, 0.1417 and 0.1323; average precision (AP) values were 0.9019, 0.8789 and 0.8548, respectively. SHAP analysis revealed that longer operation time, extended cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration, prolonged aortic cross-clamp (ACC) time, advanced age, higher plasma transfusion volume, elevated serum creatinine and increased white blood cell (WBC) count significantly contributed to higher model predictions.
conclusionsThis study developed an interpretable predictive model based on the SVM algorithm to assess long-term survival in TAAD patients. The model demonstrated accuracy, precision, and robustness in identifying high-risk patients, providing reliable evidence for clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.