Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40229867›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2025

Planning intensive care unit admission after elective major abdominal surgery: good clinical practice document by SIAARTI-SIC-ANIARTI.

Bruna Lavezzo, Giandomenico Biancofiore, Ersilia Luca, Roberto Balagna, Elena Bignami, Ugo Boggi, Rita Cataldo, Giuseppe Chiaramonte, Andrea Cortegiani, Umberto Fiandra and 9 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Bruna LavezzoAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, SS Annunziata Hospital, Savigliano, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Cuneo1, Cuneo, Italy. brunalavezzo@libero.it.
Giandomenico BiancofioreDivision of Transplant Anesthesia and Critical Care, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Ersilia LucaDepartment of Emergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Roberto BalagnaEmergency Department Azienda Sanitaria Locale Città di Torino, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Martini Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Elena BignamiAnesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Ugo BoggiDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Rita CataldoOperative Research Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe ChiaramonteAnesthesia and Critical Care Department IRCCS, ISMETT-Istituto Mediterraneo Per I Trapianti E Terapie Ad Alta Specializzazione, Palermo, Italy.
Andrea CortegianiSection of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Department of Surgical Oncological and Oral Science, Paolo Giaccone Polyclinic University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Umberto FiandraDepartment of Quality, Risk Management and Accreditation, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Roberta MarianiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Treatment, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Matteo ManiciAnesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Alessia MatteiOperative Research Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Liliana SollazziDepartment of Emergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Luigi TritapepeDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Martina TosiAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Stefano TuriDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Mauro ZagoRobotic and Emergency Surgery Department, General and Emergency Surgery Division, A. Manzoni Hospital, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy.
Paola AcetoDepartment of Emergency, Anesthesiological and Reanimation Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. paola.aceto@policlinicogemelli.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative complications (PCs) are a major cause of mortality following elective major abdominal surgery (EMAS). The increasing complexity of abdominal procedures, particularly in oncology, may significantly affect patient outcomes. However, this has also introduced a higher variability in postoperative management, and the use of tailored approaches to address critical issues such as hemodynamic stabilization, infection management, and respiratory failure. While elective admission to intensive care units (ICU) is a standard practice to manage high-risk surgical patients, ICU resource allocation is often influenced by local practices and bed availability.This document presents a framework for preoperative ICU admission planning after EMAS. It focuses on the identification of patient and surgical risk factors-using established scoring systems-and provides statements to determine ICU admission. The aim is to optimize resource allocation, reduce PCs, and prevent unplanned ICU admissions. This good clinical practice statement was developed through a multidisciplinary panel formed by selected members coming from SIAARTI (Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care), SIC (Italian Society of Surgery) and ANIARTI (National Association of Critical Area Nurses).The designed scientific board developed, through a systematic literature review and a consensus methodology, a roadmap for defining the priorities of perioperative care based on the complexity of the patient and the surgical procedure. Eventually, the panel worked out statements about six voted queries that could have supported the preoperative indication to postoperative ICU admission.Evaluation of patients' characteristics, comorbidities, and surgical factors are all essential to plan ICU admission for immediate postoperative patient care after EMAS.The presence and severity of comorbidities, assessed through various severity scores, play a crucial role in predicting PCs and guiding ICU admission decisions. Tools such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Rockwood Frailty Index, along with surgical risk scores and intraoperative events, help define the need for intensive care. Preoperative frailty assessment-achieved using the Clinical Frailty Scale-is essential to anticipate postoperative care needs. Finally, during the postoperative phase, continuous monitoring and reassessment in the post-anesthesia care unit are key to determine whether ICU admission is required. Establishing high-dependency units and tailored care pathways based on individual patient needs and available resources will enhance patient outcomes and optimize postoperative care.

Indexed as

Abdominal surgeryFrailtyIntensive care unitPlanning admissionRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40229867
PMCPMC11995668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.