ReviewBMC nursing2025
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of resilience-focused interventions for nurses: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Review in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Psychometric Properties of the ICU Nurses' Moral Resilience Scale.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Beyond Individual Resilience: A Social-Ecological Perspective on Sustaining the NICU Nursing Workforce.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Stress, burnout, and depressive symptoms among nurses in a Lebanese academic medical center: a cross-sectional wellness needs assessment.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Workforce mental health as health security infrastructure: protecting emergency response capacity during public health emergencies.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Attachment insecurity, professional quality of life, and perceived posttraumatic growth among hospital nurses.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The effect of the online stress management program on individual workload perception and stress in nurses: a non-randomized quasi-experimental design study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- From Research to Practice: Implementing an Evidence-Based Intervention for Nurse Well-Being in a Healthcare System.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe mental health of nurses is deteriorating. Maintaining nurses' resilience has become a focal point for future nursing development.
objectiveWe aim to rank the effectiveness and acceptability of resilience-focused interventions for nurses.
methodsA systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted, with comprehensive searches across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and other databases. Frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses were employed, and RoB-2 was used to assess the quality of evidence.
resultsResilience-focused interventions were found to significantly enhance nurses' resilience (95%CI 0.61, 1.41). Offline field interventions (95%CI 0.64, 1.59) outperformed online interventions (95%CI -0.02, 0.45). Both group (95%CI 0.32, 0.87) and individual (95%CI 0.63, 1.59) interventions showed effectiveness. Anger Management Psychoeducation (95%CI 3.65,7.93, SUCRA = 98.2), Emotional Intelligence training (95%CI 3.32,6.51, SUCRA = 95), and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (95%CI 2.60,5.88, SUCRA = 92.4) were the most effective interventions.
conclusionAnger Management Psychoeducation, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, and Emotional Intelligence training are the most effective interventions for enhancing nurses' resilience. INTERNATIONAL PROSPECTIVE REGISTER OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: CRD42021289477. REGISTRATION OF CLINICAL TRIAL AND REGISTRATION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.