ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Evaluation of the clinical effect of inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronous laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer: a comparative study.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the technical innovation and clinical application effect of inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronous laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer.
methodsThe clinical data of 180 patients with esophageal cancer treated by the same surgical team from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronous laparoscopic group (n = 93) and the McKeown group (n = 87) according to the surgical approach. Preoperative general baseline data, perioperative indices, postoperative indices, and short- and long-term survival rates were recorded and statistically analyzed for both groups.
resultsCompared to McKeown's procedure, the inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronized laparoscopic esophagectomy was associated with relatively less operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay, specifically (94.46 ± 20.17) minutes, (36.76 ± 16.63)ml, and (13.63 ± 2.57) days, respectively. At the same time, the postoperative complication rate of the inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronized laparoscopic esophagectomy was low compared to the postoperative complication rate of McKeown's procedure.
conclusionCompared with the traditional McKeown procedure, the patients treated with inflatable mediastinoscopy synchronous laparoscopic radical resection of esophageal cancer have a lower incidence of thoracic complications, shorter operation time, less pain, and faster postoperative recovery so that it can be used as a new supplementary method for mainstream McKeown radical resection of esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.