Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40229841›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care2025

Treatment effect of intravenous high-dose selenium in sepsis phenotypes: a retrospective analysis of a large multicenter randomized controlled trial.

David I Radke, Holger Bogatsch, Christoph Engel, Frank Bloos, Patrick Meybohm, Michael Bauer, Anna Lulu Homayr, Christian Stoppe, Gunnar Elke, Matthias Lindner and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David I Radke *Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany. david.radke@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9189-5747
Holger Bogatsch *Clinical Trial Centre Leipzig, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Christoph EngelInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7247-282X
Frank BloosDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0767-7941
Patrick MeybohmDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2666-8696
Michael BauerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1521-3514
Anna Lulu HomayrDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Christian StoppeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2028-2039
Gunnar ElkeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany. gunnar.elke@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4948-1605
Matthias LindnerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2647-7790
SepNet Critical Care Trials Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment effect of high-dose intravenous selenium remains controversial in patients with sepsis or septic shock. Here, we reanalyzed data from the randomized placebo-controlled trial of Sodium Selenite and Procalcitonin Guided Antimicrobial Therapy in Severe Sepsis (SISPCT) to reveal possible treatment differences according to established sepsis phenotypes.

methodsIn this secondary data analysis of the SISPCT trial all 1089 patients of the original study were included. Patients were assigned to one of the four phenotypes by comparing patient variables with the Sepsis Endotyping in Emergency Care (SENECA) validation cohort. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests.

resultsNo robust effect of selenium on mortality and other outcome parameters could be determined in any sepsis phenotype. Phenotype frequencies were markedly different in our study cohort compared to previous reports (α: 2.2%, β: 6.3%, γ: 68.0%, δ: 23.4%). Differences in mortality between the respective phenotypes were not significant overall; however, 28-day mortality showed a lower mortality for the α- (20.8%) and β-phenotype (20.3%), followed by the γ- (27.1%), and δ-phenotype (28.5%).

conclusionsApplication of the four sepsis phenotypes to the SISPCT study cohort showed discrete but non-significant mortality differences within 28 days. However, beneficial treatment effects of high-dose intravenous selenium were still not detectable after categorizing the SISPCT study cohort according to four phenotype criteria.

Indexed as

Individualized medicineMicronutrientOxidative stressPharmaconutritionSepsisSepsis phenotypesSeptic shockSodium selenite

Identifiers

PMID40229841
PMCPMC11995462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.