ArticleBMC nursing2025
Measuring readiness for nurse-led shared decision making in clinical practice: development and first testing of the RSDM-N scale.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectTo develop a scale to measure the organizational readiness for change (ORC) in nurse-led shared decision-making (SDM) in clinical practice of China, test its reliability and validity, and conduct an analysis of the current status of nurse-led SDM readiness.
methodsThis study follows the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology guidance and has two phases. The first phase, based on ORC theory, an item pool was formed through literature review, qualitative interviews and group discussions. Two rounds of Delphi consultations were conducted to optimize items, developed an initial scale. Cognitive interviews were then conducted to understand the target population's comprehension of each item, addressing differences during the development process, resulting in the first scale version. In the second phase, the scale underwent reliability and validity testing, and the results were analyzed to assess the current status of nurse-led SDM readiness.
resultsThe final scale consists of 55 items across five dimensions.The overall Cronbach's α coefficient is 0.987, with a split-half reliability of 0.911, a test-retest reliability of 0.904, and an average content validity index of 0.989, indicating good reliability and validity. A field test was conducted among 496 nurses, revealing that the total score of nurses' SDM readiness ranged from 118 to 270, with an average of 209.79 ± 35.82.
conclusionThe RSDM-N scale exhibits sufficient measurement qualities for assessing nurse-led SDM readiness in China, guiding the implementation of nurse-led SDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.