ArticleBMC cancer2025
Development and validation of a nomogram model of lung metastasis in breast cancer based on machine learning algorithm and cytokines.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- External validation of a nomogram for de novo bone metastasis in breast cancer: a single-center Mexican cohort.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Development of machine learning and nomogram models to predict lung metastasis and prognosticate survival in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe relationship between cytokines and lung metastasis (LM) in breast cancer (BC) remains unclear and current clinical methods for identifying breast cancer lung metastasis (BCLM) lack precision, thus underscoring the need for an accurate risk prediction model. This study aimed to apply machine learning algorithms for identifying the key risk factors for BCLM before developing a reliable prediction model centered on cytokines.
methodsThis population-based retrospective study included 326 BC patients admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between September 2018 and September 2023. After randomly assigning the patients to a training cohort (70%; n = 228) or a validation cohort (30%; n = 98) the risk factors for BCLM were identified using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Random Forest (RF) models. Significant risk factors were visualized with a Venn diagram and incorporated into a nomogram model, the performance of which was then evaluated according to three criteria, namely discrimination, calibration and clinical utility using calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsAmong the cohort, 70 patients developed LM. A nomogram was then developed to predict the 5-year and 10-year BCLM risk by incorporating five key variables, namely endocrine therapy, hsCRP, IL6, IFN-ɑ and TNF-ɑ. For the 5-year prediction model, the training and validation cohorts had AUC values of 0.786 (95% CI: 0.691-0.881) and 0.627 (95% CI: 0.441-0.813), respectively, while for the 10-year prediction model, the corresponding AUC values were 0.687 (95% CI: 0.528-0.847) and 0.797 (95% CI: 0.605-0.988), respectively. ROC analysis further confirmed the model's strong discriminative ability, while calibration plots indicated that the predicted and observed outcomes were in good agreement in both cohorts. Finally, DCA demonstrated the model's effectiveness in clinical practice.
conclusionUsing machine learning algorithms, this study developed aa nomogram that could effectively identify BC patients who were at a higher risk of developing LM, thus providing a valuable tool for decision-making in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.