ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Silicone ventilation catheter for high-frequency jet ventilation in interventional pulmonology; a new approach.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimThis study evaluated the efficacy of high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) using a silicone catheter in patients undergoing rigid bronchoscopy (RB). MATERIALS AND
methodsFollowing necessary approval for a retrospective clinical and experimental study, the data of patients who underwent HFJV using a silicone catheter during RB under general anesthesia through interventional pulmonology (IP) between January 2024 and August 2024 were analyzed. Prior to the study, flow/thermography tests were conducted to assess the efficacy of the silicone catheter. Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis before, during, and after anesthesia as well as patient hemodynamic and oxygen saturation (SpO
resultA total of 25 patients were included in the study. The median duration of the procedure was 35 min. In 21 (84%) patients, the procedure was successfully performed with HFJV using a silicone ventilation catheter. In these successful cases, the hemodynamic parameters and ABG values remained within normal limits throughout the procedure. The median values of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO
conclusionThe findings of the present study demonstrated that the utilization of silicone catheters in conjunction with HFJV is both safe and efficacious for IP and RB procedures. These results suggest that HFJV with a silicone catheter may be a viable option in RB procedures. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: It cannot be applicable because it is a retrospective study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.