ArticleBMC public health2025
Investigating membership attrition dynamics in community-based health insurance: a survival analysis of socioeconomic and program-specific determinants in the Amhara Region, Northwest Ethiopia.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Women's Intention to Maintain Enrollment in Community-Based Health Insurance: A Multilevel Analysis in the Sidama Region, Southern Ethiopia, 2024.Health services insights · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite substantial growth and increased enrollment in Ethiopia's CBHI program, achieving universal coverage and retaining members remain challenging. This study, however, focuses on the persistent issue of dropout rates, which threaten the program's sustainability, while previous research has often focused on enrollment.
methodThe dependent variable is"time to membership attrition,"defined as an event "Dropout,"with independent variables including socioeconomic and program factors. Using Cochran's formula, data were collected from 772 (208 failure) respondents across five administrative zones. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimation, Cox Regression, and the Weibull AFT Model.
resultDropout rates peaked at an average membership duration of 4.09 years, with increasing hazard rates (Weibull shape parameter = 2.077, p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicates safety net beneficiaries had a lower dropout rate (67.8%) than non-beneficiaries (76.6%) and longer survival (Chi-square = 4.083, p = 0.043). Respondents with 4-6 hectares had the shortest survival (5.88 years) and a higher dropout risk (B = 0.417, p = 0.042), while non-landowners had a higher attrition risk (HR = 1.266, p = 0.814), Farm owners had a lower dropout rate (70.7%) (Chi-square = 1.569, p = 0.021). Lower-middle-income members had a higher attrition risk (HR = 1.999, p = 0.042) with a mean survival of 6.28 years, compared to 6.47 years for upper-middle-income. Perceived healthcare quality influenced dropout risk, increasing it by 5.9% for fair quality than poor (HR = 3.368, p < 0.000), and significantly for good quality as well (HR = 2.284, p < 0.000). Moderate financial protection (not catastrophic spending) increased dropout risk by 7.3% compared to high protection (HR = 1.125, p = 0.040).
conclusionDropout rates peak in the early years of membership and increase over time. Enrolling in safety nets and having smaller land sizes enhanced retention rates, while extensive landholdings and being classified as Lower-Middle Income led to higher dropout rates; however, ownership of modern amenities had minimal impact on retention. Perceived healthcare quality and financial protection significantly influence CBHI retention, while program service quality has little effect, underscoring the need for policies that prioritize improving service quality, accessibility, and affordability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.