ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Application effect of standardized nursing process of abdominal drainage tube in cholelithiasis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Small intestinal fistula caused by drainage tube removal: A case report.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundand aims: Although abdominal drainage tubes have been widely used to treat cholelithiasis, complications still affect patients' prognoses. There is no Standardized Nursing Process (SNP) for abdominal drainage tubes after Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study aims to observe the clinical efficacy and explore the feasibility of SNP intervention for abdominal drainage tubes in cholelithiasis patients after LC.
methodsThis retrospective study included the patients with cholelithiasis admitted to Xishan People's Hospital of Wuxi City between Jan 2023 and Aug 2024. Patients were separated into Standardized Nursing Process (SNP) group and non-Standardized Nursing Process (non-SNP) group. The outcomes were compared between the two groups, and Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the factors associated with SNP. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
resultsAmong a total of 264 patients with cholelithiasis who were included in the study, 147 patients were treated with SNP, and the other 117 patients were treated without SNP. Compared with non-SNP, multivariate analysis suggested that SNP was an independent factor linked to alleviation of postoperative pain (OR = 0.22, 95%CI: 0.13-0.36) (P < 0.001), strongly associated with the activity rate of getting out of bed within 24 h (OR = 2.28, 95%CI:1.33-3.91), effectively associated with a lower incidence of drainage tube outlet leakage and post-extubation leakage. Importantly, SNP management correlated with higher patient satisfaction (p < 0.001).
conclusionsSNP implementation correlated with improved activity rate of getting out of bed within 24 h after LC, fewer occurrence of post-extubation leakage, reduced postoperative pain and higher satisfaction rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.