Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2025
PACAP38-induced migraine attacks are independent of CGRP signaling: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05635604 (Molecular Stratification of Signaling Pathways Underlying Migraine Pathophysiology.), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Molecular Stratification of Signaling Pathways Underlying Migraine Pathophysiology.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Observational
- [Congress report-International Headache Congress 2025 : São Paulo, Brasil, 10-13 September 2025].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Pharmacological mechanisms underlying neurovascular alterations related to resistant and refractory migraine: CGRP pathways and beyond.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Review
- Innovative treatments for migraine: a new era.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Article
- A review on gut microbiota and migraine severity: a complex relationship.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Emerging pharmacological targets in migraine therapy: CGRP and beyond.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- CGRP and Migraine: Real-World Insights and Future Therapeutic Directions.Annual review of medicine · 2026Review
- Integrative Migraine Therapy: From Current Concepts to Future Directions-A Plastic Surgeon's Perspective.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- PACAP versus CGRP in migraine: From mouse models to clinical translation.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2025Review
- Trigeminal nerve-driven neurogenic inflammation linking migraine to glioblastoma invasion: a literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCalcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP38) are key pathogenic drivers of migraine. While CGRP has become the target of several mechanism-based therapies, less is known about PACAP38 signaling in migraine pathogenesis. Previous studies suggest that PACAP38 can modulate CGRP release, but it might also induce migraine attacks via CGRP-independent mechanisms. Whether PACAP38 signaling is independent of and parallel to CGRP signaling has implications for future therapeutic strategies. Here, we aimed to ascertain whether PACAP-38 can mediate migraine attacks independently of CGRP signaling by assessing the ability of eptinezumab to prevent PACAP38-induced migraine attacks.
methodsIn a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, we randomly allocated adults with migraine without aura to receive either an intravenous infusion of 300-mg eptinezumab or matching placebo (isotonic saline) over 30 min. Two hours post-infusion, all participants were administered PACAP38 intravenously at 10 pmol/kg/min for 20 min. The primary endpoint was the incidence of migraine attacks during the 24-hour observational period post-infusion of eptinezumab or placebo. Key secondary endpoints included between-group differences in incidence of headache, and area under the curve (AUC) for headache intensity scores, diameter of the superficial temporal artery (STA) and facial skin blood flow.
resultsA total of 38 participants were enrolled and completed the study. No difference was observed in the incidence of PACAP38-induced migraine attacks between the eptinezumab (10 [53%] of 19) and placebo (12 [63%] of 19) groups (Fisher's exact test: P = 0.74). Headache of any intensity was reported by 15 (79%) participants in the eptinezumab group, compared with 16 (84%) participants in the placebo group (Fisher's exact test: P > 0.99). The AUC for headache intensity scores did not differ between the two groups during the first 12 h post-infusion of PACAP38 (Mann-Whitney U-test: P = 0.96). No differences were observed in AUC between the eptinezumab and placebo groups with respect to changes in STA diameter and facial skin blood flow (P > 0.05). No serious adverse events occurred.
conclusionsOur results suggest that PACAP38 may mediate its signaling independently of CGRP in migraine pathogenesis. Therapies targeting PACAP signaling are thus a promising new avenue for treating migraine.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05635604. Registered on November 15 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.