ArticleBMC cancer2025
Development of a clinical-molecular prediction model for central lymph node metastasis in cN0 stage papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative predictors of occult central lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma: a common data model-based retrospective cohort study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Article
- A clinical nomogram for evaluating occult central lymph node metastasis in clinically low-risk, unifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Personalized prediction of lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a nomogram and web calculator.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying occult central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) is essential for guiding prophylactic lymph node dissection (PLND) in patients with cN0 stage papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). This study aimed to identify molecular prognostic biomarkers associated with PTMC and develop a clinical-molecular prediction model for CLNM.
methodsDifferentially expressed genes (DEGs) in PTMC were identified through bioinformatics analysis of the TCGA database. Prognostic DEGs were selected using Cox and LASSO regression analyses, and a risk-scoring model was constructed based on these genes. The prognostic value of the model was validated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and ROC curves. DEG expression levels were compared between patients with CLNM and those without (NCLNM). Clinical data and surgical specimens were collected from 404 patients with cN0 stage PTMC treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University in 2022. The cohort was randomly divided into a derivation cohort (n = 323) and a validation cohort (n = 81). DEG expression was quantified using RT-qPCR. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted in the derivation cohort to identify predictors of CLNM and develop a predictive model. The model's performance was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsIn the TCGA database, FN1, MT-1 F, and TFF3 were identified as prognostic biomarkers. Risk scores based on these genes achieved AUCs of 0.789 (5 years) and 0.674 (10 years) for predicting disease-free survival. Furthermore, FN1, MT-1 F, and TFF3 expression levels were significantly higher in the CLNM group compared to the NCLNM group. Among the 404 PTMC patients, the incidence of CLNM was 42.6% (n = 172). RT-qPCR analysis demonstrated significantly elevated expression of FN1 in both PTMC tissues compared to normal tissues and in the CLNM group relative to the NCLNM group, while MT-1 F and TFF3 exhibited markedly reduced expression levels. In the derivation cohort, FN1, MT-1 F, TFF3, tumor size ≥5 mm, calcification, multifocality, and extrathyroidal extension were independent predictors of CLNM. The prediction model based on these factors showed AUCs of 0.736 (derivation cohort) and 0.813 (validation cohort). Moreover, calibration curves, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (χ² = 2.411, P = 0.966), and DCA confirmed the model's robust performance and clinical utility.
conclusionFN1, MT-1 F, and TFF3 are valuable prognostic biomarkers for PTMC. The clinical-molecular prediction model incorporating these genes provides a basis for personalized PLND decision-making in cN0 stage PTMC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.